IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v35y2020i5p675-692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived severity of smuggling at the border of Táchira-North of Santander: Health Psychology Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel E. Riaño-Garzón
  • Nathalie C. Raynaud
  • Neida Albornoz-Arias
  • Rina Mazuera-Arias

Abstract

This study analyzed the differences in the perception of severity of smuggling between consumers and smugglers of the Colombian-Venezuelan border. A correlational-comparative design was used, and the population selected was the inhabitants of North of Santander Department, Colombia, calculating a stratified randomized sampling for 2,383 people. It was found that 6% of the sample belonged to illegal traders, being mostly men. The comparison performed by sex concluded that the level of severity perceived is greater in women, and both groups gave greater relevance to the risk of losing the economic investment front others risks of more severity. The comparison by municipalities, revealed that the capital presented lower levels of perceived severity than other territories. In addition, greater perceived severity of smuggling in young adults, heads of household, married people, traders who earned less than two Colombian minimum wages and who traded individually were identified. Finally, a positive relationship was found between the level of perceived severity and conditions such as the number of products smuggled or work income.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel E. Riaño-Garzón & Nathalie C. Raynaud & Neida Albornoz-Arias & Rina Mazuera-Arias, 2020. "Perceived severity of smuggling at the border of Táchira-North of Santander: Health Psychology Approach," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 675-692, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:35:y:2020:i:5:p:675-692
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2018.1457976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2018.1457976
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2018.1457976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:35:y:2020:i:5:p:675-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.