IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v35y2020i4p545-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Border Disputes and Identity in Anglophone British Columbia: 1859–1903

Author

Listed:
  • Ari Finnsson

Abstract

This paper examines the interaction of discourses surrounding the international border and national identity in British Columbia from 1859 through to the turn of the century. Media coverage in British Columbia of the 1859 San Juan border dispute indicates that the international boundary, as the marker of separation between the United States and British Columbia, became an important symbol of British identity in North America. Although British customs continued to be valued, the period of 1859–1872 saw the development of an Anglophone identity in British Columbia that differentiated itself from Great Britain due in part to a lack of British involvement in the region. Confederation with Canada in 1871, however, meant that the parameters of the debate around the 1903 Alaskan border dispute had changed since 1859/72: British Columbia now found itself united with Canada in a shared defence of the international boundary. The Alaskan boundary dispute became a symbol that both British Columbians and other Canadians could understand and use to interpret their relationship with the United States. Border disputes, therefore, provided a common ground upon which British Columbians and Canadians could build a shared identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ari Finnsson, 2020. "Border Disputes and Identity in Anglophone British Columbia: 1859–1903," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 545-562, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:35:y:2020:i:4:p:545-562
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2019.1605303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2019.1605303
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2019.1605303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:35:y:2020:i:4:p:545-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.