IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v34y2019i3p395-412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradigms of Border Studies and the Metacultural Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Anton A. Kireev
  • Sergei E. Yachin

Abstract

Reflection on the issues of paradigmatic foundations, the ontological, epistemological, and praxeological assumptions of border studies gives scholars an opportunity to identify and to overcome the limits of cognitive capabilities of this field. Contemporary individual-centric paradigm of border studies emerged as a result of the “anthropological turn” of the 20th century philosophy where the most important role was played by phenomenology, existentialism, post-positivism, and post-structuralism. However, a more profound effect on the content of the individual-centric paradigm was produced by its struggle against the nature-centric paradigm that prevailed in the study of borders before the 1960s. Post-non-classical revolution in science and philosophy, and the internal contradictions of border studies have created preconditions for the emergence of a new polycentric paradigm. The authors of this article offer the scholars and managers of borders to look at the metacultural approach, which is based on the principles of the polycentric paradigm. This approach can help solve an extremely acute problem of exhaustion of the EU integration capacities.

Suggested Citation

  • Anton A. Kireev & Sergei E. Yachin, 2019. "Paradigms of Border Studies and the Metacultural Approach," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 395-412, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:34:y:2019:i:3:p:395-412
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1344563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2017.1344563
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2017.1344563?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:34:y:2019:i:3:p:395-412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.