IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of the Segregation Wall on the Two-state Solution


  • Ahmad El-Atrash


The two-state scenario is celebrated as the feasible solution to the geo-political conflict that spawns Palestine/Israel. The final status negotiation items between Palestinians and Israelis based on the two-state solution are mainly borders, Israeli settlements, Jerusalem, water, and Palestinian refugees. This article argues that the Segregation Wall that Israel started building in the West Bank in 2002 has negative implications for the feasibility of the two-state solution, and would lead to unsustainable outcomes, especially for the Palestinian statehood. This article aims at unveiling the anticipated adverse reverberations of the Segregation Wall on the two-state solution by parsing the main items deferred to final status negotiations. The research methodology in this article used mixed research methods, drawing from both quantitative and qualitative approaches and using data from primary and secondary sources, including field observations, archived research of published documents by state and non-state actors, along with mapping interpretations using Geographic Information Systems. The article starts by introducing the current predicaments and by defining the Segregation Wall; its main elements and characteristics. Afterwards, the article squarely and substantially provides factual analysis and discussion of the anticipated negative implications on the question of borders, Israeli settlements, Jerusalem, water, and Palestinian refugees, which are all key final status negotiations issues for a proposed two-state solution.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad El-Atrash, 2016. "Implications of the Segregation Wall on the Two-state Solution," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 365-380, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:31:y:2016:i:3:p:365-380
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2016.1174594

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:31:y:2016:i:3:p:365-380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.