IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v31y2016i1p73-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Non-gated Gated Community of Stapleton

Author

Listed:
  • Huston J. Gibson
  • Jessica L. Canfield

Abstract

Stapleton is an urban infill development with a master plan that calls for many ambitious and benevolent social, environmental, and economic goals: aiming to become a well-integrated, inclusive community; promoting internal diversity by providing an array of land-use and housing options; and integrating externally through fostered connections to surrounding, already established neighborhoods. However, through observations and walking interviews with residents, we have reason to question the fulfillment of these goals. Instead we found several physical and non-physical barriers that clearly divide the community, both internally and externally. This study is intended to advance discourse on community borders, particularly for infill developments integrating into already existing urban fabrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Huston J. Gibson & Jessica L. Canfield, 2016. "The Non-gated Gated Community of Stapleton," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 73-89, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:31:y:2016:i:1:p:73-89
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2015.1124241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2015.1124241
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2015.1124241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:31:y:2016:i:1:p:73-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.