IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v27y2012i2p139-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Wall, the Fence, and the Gate: Reflexive Metaphors along the Canada–US Border

Author

Listed:
  • Heather Nicol

Abstract

The reading of “common legacy” has recently developed as the dominant discourse defining Canada–US relations throughout the 20th century. It supports the politically expedient perception that the “interconnected” status of the Canada–US border is a historical fact. Yet viewed historically, this is not so clear. Historical narratives tell two equally compelling stories, one of facilitation and cooperation along the Canada–US border, and the other of one of resistance to a “borderless” North America. This paper traces the story of the border from a Canadian perspective. It argues that there is a strong perceptual component and reflexivity in Canada–US relations, even those now brokered through common security arrangements. Such perceptions are linked to national border-building discourses and mobilized through popularized as well as formal geopolitical discourses: that is to say via newspapers, political cartoons as well as formal political texts and agreements. Historically such images and discourses have emphasized the differences, as well as commonalities, along the line. The result has been a significant degree of reflexivity, and this has created a somewhat unique context for North American cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather Nicol, 2012. "The Wall, the Fence, and the Gate: Reflexive Metaphors along the Canada–US Border," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 139-165.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:27:y:2012:i:2:p:139-165
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2012.687213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2012.687213
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2012.687213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:27:y:2012:i:2:p:139-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.