IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjapxx/v4y1999i1p100-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asia, Europe and human rights: From confrontation to dialogue?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Freeman

Abstract

The new, so‐called ‘ethical’ foreign policy of the UK Government places the promotion of human rights at its heart, and emphasizes multilateral and especially European action as a key strategy for its implementation. The recent Asia‐Europe Meeting in London (ASEM‐2) was dominated by consideration of the East Asian financial crisis, and human rights issues appear to have been marginalized. This suggests that parallel Asia‐Europe NGO dialogue may play an important role in redressing the balance in favour of popular interests. The paper argues, however, that such an intercultural dialogue on human rights, though extremely welcome, should be informed by clear thinking about the relation between the idea of universal human rights and the claims of particular cultures. This requires an engagement with the ‘Asian values’ debate. In this connection, the paper argues that the first, crudely polemical phase of this debate has been superseded by much more refined ‘new Asian thinking’ about human rights and Asian culture. An important intellectual space has been created for productive dialogue between East Asian and Western human rights advocates. Just as the Asia‐Europe economic dialogue supplements that between East Asia and the USA, so Europe can supplement the political and intellectual role of the USA in the human rights dialogue with East Asia with distinctive contributions of its own.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Freeman, 1999. "Asia, Europe and human rights: From confrontation to dialogue?," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 100-122.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:4:y:1999:i:1:p:100-122
    DOI: 10.1080/13547869908724672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13547869908724672
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13547869908724672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:4:y:1999:i:1:p:100-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.