IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjapxx/v30y2025i4p1486-1505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of organic soil fertility measures and their impact on farm outcomes: a case study of millet cultivators in India

Author

Listed:
  • Dayakar Peddi
  • B. Suresh Reddy
  • E. Revathi

Abstract

This article investigated the economic impact of adopting organic soil fertility measures (OSFM) on millet farming outcomes in rainfed regions of rural India. Using survey data from 900 millet farmers, the analysis applied an endogenous switching regression model to correct for selection bias arising from both observable and unobservable factors. The results indicated that factors such as soil type, use of farmyard manure, crop diversification, gender of the household head, access to agricultural resources, proximity to residence and markets and education levels significantly influenced farmers’ adoption of OSFM. Notably, the adoption of OSFM had a positive and statistically significant impact on farm profits, with OSFM adopters gaining ₹5998 more than nonadopters. The average treatment effect on the treated for OSFM was 9.80% higher than for non-OSFM farmers. These findings reinforcing the importance of promoting OSFM practices in similar rainfed farming regions of the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Dayakar Peddi & B. Suresh Reddy & E. Revathi, 2025. "Adoption of organic soil fertility measures and their impact on farm outcomes: a case study of millet cultivators in India," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 1486-1505, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:30:y:2025:i:4:p:1486-1505
    DOI: 10.1080/13547860.2024.2378530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13547860.2024.2378530
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13547860.2024.2378530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:30:y:2025:i:4:p:1486-1505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.