IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjapxx/v25y2020i2p348-370.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the matrilineality make a difference? Land, kinship and women's empowerment in Bobonaro district, Timor-Leste

Author

Listed:
  • Vanda Jesus Santos Narciso
  • Pedro Damião Sousa Henriques

Abstract

This article investigates the roles that land rights and kinship norms have on rural women’s empowerment in the Bobonaro district of Timor-Leste. To this aim, a case study was carried out, using a questionnaire survey to compare three kinship groups (harmonic matrilineal, matrilineal and patrilineal). The land rights considered are ownership and control. The measurement of empowerment is based on three questions relating to household decision-making. Women’s autonomy and participation in decisions are also analyzed. The data presented show the importance of not only the ownership of land, but also effective and independent women’s land rights and the kinship system to women’s empowerment. Therefore, in order to contribute to gender equality, land policies should take gender and kinship into close consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanda Jesus Santos Narciso & Pedro Damião Sousa Henriques, 2020. "Does the matrilineality make a difference? Land, kinship and women's empowerment in Bobonaro district, Timor-Leste," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 348-370, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:25:y:2020:i:2:p:348-370
    DOI: 10.1080/13547860.2019.1665295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13547860.2019.1665295
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13547860.2019.1665295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:25:y:2020:i:2:p:348-370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.