IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjapxx/v24y2019i4p530-555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the type of investor matter? An analysis of fixed-asset investments in rural China

Author

Listed:
  • Lingli Xiao
  • Jing Li
  • Jing Wang

Abstract

There are two major types of investors of rural fixed-asset investments (FAIs) in China: collective FAIs and private FAIs. To analyze the effect of investors of different types on the efficiency of rural FAIs, we apply a two-regime spatial Durbin model (SDM) based on panel data from 1993 to 2012 in China. Our major findings include: (1) rural FAIs promote the rural economy, which shows positive spatial interdependence and the spatial effects differ across regions; (2) the investment efficiency of collective FAIs is weaker than that of private FAIs and decreases over time; and (3) rural private FAIs present significantly positive spatial spillover effects on rural economies, whereas rural collective FAIs show negative spatial spillover effects in the first-decade (1993–2002) sub-sample and no significant spatial spillover effect in the second-decade (2003–2012) sub-sample. Policy implications are proposed accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingli Xiao & Jing Li & Jing Wang, 2019. "Does the type of investor matter? An analysis of fixed-asset investments in rural China," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 530-555, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:24:y:2019:i:4:p:530-555
    DOI: 10.1080/13547860.2019.1664535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13547860.2019.1664535
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13547860.2019.1664535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjapxx:v:24:y:2019:i:4:p:530-555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjap .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.