IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rherxx/v90y2025i1p38-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Chinese Malthus or an English Hung? A Comparative Analysis of Hung Liang-chi and Thomas Robert Malthus’s Population Theories

Author

Listed:
  • Samantha Moon

Abstract

Thomas Robert Malthus is well known for his 1798 treatise on population theory, An Essay on the Principle of Population. Lesser known is Chinese philosopher Hung Liang-chi, who, several years earlier, wrote a series of essays that outlined a population theory eerily similar to Malthus’s. While it is clear that the men never interacted, the parallels between the men’s theories – population growth’s inevitable outstripping of the means of subsistence, arithmetic vs geometric growth, and natural checks to population growth – have led to some hailing Hung as a ‘Chinese Malthus’. This paper presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of the population theories of Hung and Malthus. Analysis centres on the ways the cultural, political, and social contexts of China and England influenced the development and framing of the men’s theories and seeks to answer the following question: can Hung accurately be called a Chinese Malthus?

Suggested Citation

  • Samantha Moon, 2025. "A Chinese Malthus or an English Hung? A Comparative Analysis of Hung Liang-chi and Thomas Robert Malthus’s Population Theories," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 90(1), pages 38-54, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:90:y:2025:i:1:p:38-54
    DOI: 10.1080/10370196.2025.2535794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10370196.2025.2535794
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10370196.2025.2535794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:90:y:2025:i:1:p:38-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rher .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.