IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rherxx/v53y2011i1p55-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Luxury, Crisis and Consumption: Sir James Steuart and the Eighteenth-Century Luxury Debate

Author

Listed:
  • Aida Ramos

Abstract

The paper examines the contributions made by Sir James Steuart in his Principles of Political Economy (1767) to the debates about luxury consumption in the eighteenth century. The paper begins by highlighting the main contemporary arguments both for and against luxury in France and Scotland, and why the consumption of luxury goods was a contentious issue. In the next section, Steuart’s positive views on luxury are examined and located within his theory of growth. Steuart presents luxury goods as a necessary by-product of the movement from an agricultural society to an expanding manufacturing society. Unlike other contributors to the debate, such as Marquis de Mirabeau, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Adam Smith and David Hume, Steuart purposely avoids talking about luxury as a means to refine or corrupt society. By instead focusing on the workers’ role in innovation and creating desirable luxury goods, Steuart contributes a unique view of luxury not only as a generator of economic growth and increased living standards, but also as both an incentive mechanism for all economic sectors and a buffer against economic crisis. The continual creation of new luxury goods is shown to benefit society by ensuring an ongoing flow of payments, goods, and services among landlords, farmers, and manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Aida Ramos, 2011. "Luxury, Crisis and Consumption: Sir James Steuart and the Eighteenth-Century Luxury Debate," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 55-72, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:53:y:2011:i:1:p:55-72
    DOI: 10.1080/18386318.2011.11682176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/18386318.2011.11682176
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/18386318.2011.11682176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:53:y:2011:i:1:p:55-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rher .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.