IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rherxx/v44y2006i1p59-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Did Ricardo Really Have a Law of Comparative Advantage? A Comparison of Ricardo’s Version and the Modern Version

Author

Listed:
  • John Pullen

Abstract

This article compares Ricardo’s statements on the Law of Comparative Advantage (LCA) with modern versions. It interprets Ricardo’s LCA as a practical guide or as a piece of useful commercial advice for commodity traders, and argues that, contrary to modern versions, Ricardo’s LCA does not constitute a logical basis for international specialisation of production. It contends that Ricardo’s case for international specialisation is based on absolute advantage, not comparative advantage. It concludes that, if ‘LCA’is taken to mean the LCA as found in modern textbooks, then Ricardo did not have a Law of Comparative Advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • John Pullen, 2006. "Did Ricardo Really Have a Law of Comparative Advantage? A Comparison of Ricardo’s Version and the Modern Version," History of Economics Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 59-75, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:44:y:2006:i:1:p:59-75
    DOI: 10.1080/18386318.2006.11681230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/18386318.2006.11681230
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/18386318.2006.11681230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rherxx:v:44:y:2006:i:1:p:59-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rher .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.