IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v10y2025i3p446-481.html

The effect of anti-corruption efforts on evaluations of governance

Author

Listed:
  • Erik H. Wang

Abstract

How do anti-corruption efforts affect citizens’ evaluations of governance? I study the case of China’s anti-corruption campaign that was unleashed in late 2012 and is still ongoing. I utilize national survey nearly representative of urban China and original data for anti-corruption inspections by the provincial discipline inspection committees in 2018. By matching respondents’ interview dates with the dates of inspections in their localities, my identification strategy exploits exogenous variation in respondents’ exposure to the anti-corruption campaign. I find that anti-corruption efforts enhance both citizens’ evaluations of specific governance items related to the control of corruption and their general evaluations of government performance. Specifically, respondents exposed to the campaign report a lower level of perceived corruption and higher satisfaction with the Chinese government’s anti-corruption efforts; the campaign also improves their latent government satisfaction, their satisfaction with the Chinese central government, and their confidence in China’s political system. Mediation analyses reveal that anticorruption efforts improve public opinion mainly because they improve citizens’ evaluations of corruption-related governance items.

Suggested Citation

  • Erik H. Wang, 2025. "The effect of anti-corruption efforts on evaluations of governance," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 446-481, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:10:y:2025:i:3:p:446-481
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2025.2483544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2025.2483544
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2025.2483544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:10:y:2025:i:3:p:446-481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.