IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgovxx/v10y2025i2p165-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government funding and nonprofit performance in service delivery and policy engagement: exploring the mediating roles of private donations, volunteers, and network quality

Author

Listed:
  • Huirong Bi
  • Yuan (Daniel) Cheng
  • Jianxing Yu
  • Yongdong Shen

Abstract

Although concerns have been raised about the potential negative impact of government funding on nonprofit organizations, the prevailing literature suggests a generally positive association between government funding and nonprofit performance. However, much of the existing research has focused on Western contexts, with limited understanding of the mechanisms and the relationship between government funding and nonprofit performance in non-Western settings. Drawing on a unique dataset of central government funding to nonprofits in China, this study employs a mixed-methods approach to examine the mediating roles of private donations, volunteers, and network quality in the relationship between government funding and nonprofit performance. Our findings reveal that private donations mediate the positive relationship between government funding and nonprofit performance in both service delivery and policy engagement. In contrast, the number of volunteers mediate only the relationship between government funding and nonprofit service delivery, while network quality mediates the relationship between government funding and nonprofit policy engagement. These results highlight the multifaceted ways in which government funding leverages diverse resources to influence nonprofit performance and adaptation within local contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Huirong Bi & Yuan (Daniel) Cheng & Jianxing Yu & Yongdong Shen, 2025. "Government funding and nonprofit performance in service delivery and policy engagement: exploring the mediating roles of private donations, volunteers, and network quality," Journal of Chinese Governance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 165-194, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:165-194
    DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2025.2475417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23812346.2025.2475417
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23812346.2025.2475417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgovxx:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:165-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgov .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.