IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v9y2018i2p148-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on consumers’ experiences and avoidances of mobile shopping application advertisements

Author

Listed:
  • Jee Su Keem
  • Seunghee Lee

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze consumers’ experiences and avoidances of mobile shopping application advertisements. Preceding mobile shopping studies were reviewed to meet this objective and to understand mobile shopping characteristics; consequently, mobile shopping application advertisement types were selected for analysis. This study sampled 200 male and female consumers in their 20s and 30s who had experience in using mobile shopping applications. Their experiences regarding shopping application advertisements, their clicks and irritations, and particularly their avoidance of these advertisements were analyzed by advertisement type. Finally, subjects’ experiences in avoiding mobile shopping application advertisements were discussed. This study’s results can be summarized as follows: First, the group with no experience in mobile shopping application advertisements demonstrated a higher tendency to avoid these advertisements. Second, the group with experiences in clicking on mobile shopping application advertisements tended to avoid them more than their counterpart group. Third, the “reward” ad type was most favored by consumers, and alternatively, the “pop-up” ad type was shown to irritate both genders. In summary, the companies that create these application advertisements are advised to operate their own mobile shopping application advertisements with caution, to prevent irritating consumers or forcing them to avoid their advertisements.

Suggested Citation

  • Jee Su Keem & Seunghee Lee, 2018. "A study on consumers’ experiences and avoidances of mobile shopping application advertisements," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 148-160, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:148-160
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2018.1432406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2018.1432406
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2018.1432406?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:148-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.