IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v8y2017i1p21-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers’ perceptions of store location effect on the status of luxury, non-luxury, and unknown apparel brands

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Kumagai
  • Shin’ya Nagasawa

Abstract

When apparel brand managers attempt to raise their brand value, store location status is their major concern since they consider it one way to influence their brand value. This research focuses on the status of shopping malls and adjacent stores as store location factors and assesses their effects on perceived brand status. In this research, two consumer surveys on apparel brands with different characteristics (luxury, non-luxury, and unknown brands) were conducted in Japan and the variation of perceived brand status and attractiveness in different store location frames was analyzed. The result of an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) suggests store location influences perceived brand status and attractiveness of luxury brands more than in the case of non-luxury ones. Moreover, store location status is confirmed to influence unknown brands only very slightly. This result implies difficulties in raising the status of non-luxury and unknown brands just by constructing their stores in high-status locations following the luxury strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Kumagai & Shin’ya Nagasawa, 2017. "Consumers’ perceptions of store location effect on the status of luxury, non-luxury, and unknown apparel brands," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 21-39, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:21-39
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2016.1257359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2016.1257359
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2016.1257359?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:8:y:2017:i:1:p:21-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.