IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v16y2025i4p502-526.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial well-being, voluntary simplicity, and ethical fashion consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Elif Güner
  • Merve Yanar Gürce
  • Petek Tosun

Abstract

This study investigates ethical fashion consumption (EFC) with an original conceptual model based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB). The TPB framework was expanded to include financial well-being and voluntary simplicity. The research model was tested in a two-stage study with 117 participants from Turkey and 72 from Kuwait. Regression analyses were conducted in SPSS. The prominent finding in both studies was the significant impact of financial well-being on perceived behavioral control (perception of the ability to perform a behavior) and voluntary simplicity (a lifestyle choice to consume less), and, consequently, on EFC. However, the impact of attitudes on EFC was not significant in either study. Subjective norms were a significant predictor of EFC in Study 1 but not in Study 2. The findings support an extended TPB framework that integrates financial well-being and voluntary simplicity to better explain EFC. The results point out that fashion marketers can significantly benefit from having a deep (rich) product line regarding ethical options. Price, convenience, and reachability can be used as differentiation and positioning elements in the product line. Marketers may also offer products that appeal to various consumer segments regarding financial well-being and voluntary simplicity.

Suggested Citation

  • Elif Güner & Merve Yanar Gürce & Petek Tosun, 2025. "Financial well-being, voluntary simplicity, and ethical fashion consumption," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 502-526, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:502-526
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2025.2520825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2025.2520825
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2025.2520825?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:502-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.