IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v14y2023i2p123-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of perceived luxury value and use of sustainable polyester on brand trust, perceived quality risk, and consumers’ brand evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Kumagai
  • Shin’ya Nagasawa

Abstract

The study examines consumers’ brand evaluation when a sustainable polyester based on new bottle recycling technology is used in the fashion sector. Additionally, the study assesses the luxury value priorly perceived from a brand and its effect on consumers’ brand evaluations based on this sustainable development type. According to 440 samples collected in Japan, structural equation modeling reveals that the use of sustainable polyester increases perceived quality risk toward a product. The data also show that perceived luxury brand value complementarily reduces this risk perception and increases brand trust, thereby contributing to consumers’ brand attitude and purchase intention. Additionally, these effects of perceived luxury value on brand trust and perceived risk are found even in the case of low-luxury brands. According to the data, by building/enhancing luxury brand attributes prior to launching sustainable projects, companies are likely to increase the desirable consumers’ brand evaluation based on brand-related sustainable development thereafter. The results imply that luxury firms can play a leading role in sustainable development because their brand attributes inhibit consumers’ risk perceptions of this new industrial product. Meanwhile, the data imply that companies cannot instantly increase brand trust through the launch of sustainable products, although environmental sustainability is socially desirable.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Kumagai & Shin’ya Nagasawa, 2023. "Effects of perceived luxury value and use of sustainable polyester on brand trust, perceived quality risk, and consumers’ brand evaluation," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 123-142, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:123-142
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2022.2085594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2022.2085594
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2022.2085594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:123-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.