IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v12y2021i4p291-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Branded there, made here? How country equity influences fashion product consumers in China

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Shen
  • Feng Liu
  • Joseph Richards

Abstract

After decades of globalization, more and more products are made in a country different from the initial country of origin of the brand name associated with the product. As consumers evaluate brands, does it matter if a product is made in the same country as from its initial origin? In this study, we intend to address this question by examining the impacts of country equity (CE) on consumer psychology, in the context of China’s fashion market. Specifically, this study aims to (1) examine the impact of CE on Chinese consumers’ perception and purchase intention of “Made in USA” products; and (2) identify potential China’s market for “Made in USA” products. A series of hypotheses are developed and empirically tested. Among our major findings, Chinese consumers show significantly higher purchase intention, perceived quality, and perceived price for “Made in USA” products than “Made in China” products with the same brand name. Also, Chinese consumers’ CE of the US significantly affect their purchase intention, perceived quality, and perceived price of “Made in USA” products. In addition, we identify the target market characteristics of “Made in USA” products in China. The study adds to a comprehensive understanding of CE in the global market.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Shen & Feng Liu & Joseph Richards, 2021. "Branded there, made here? How country equity influences fashion product consumers in China," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 291-308, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:291-308
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2021.1939757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2021.1939757
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2021.1939757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:12:y:2021:i:4:p:291-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.