IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rfiaxx/v23y2025i3p86-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neurorights and the Common Good: Christian Ethical Perspectives on Neurotechnologies, AI, and Human Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Messer

Abstract

A wide array of current and emerging technologies combine neuroscience with artificial intelligence to collect, analyze, and exploit subjects’ brain data, modify their brain functions, and connect their brains to computers and other brains. While these technologies are said to offer many benefits, they also raise ethical concerns about identity, moral agency, privacy, human enhancement, and justice. In the face of these concerns, some have called for new “neurorights”—neurotech-specific human rights designed to protect humans’ interests from threats posed by these technologies—and these calls have found a response in current work by UNESCO. Should Christians and churches join others in advocating for new neurorights? Using the concept of the common good to frame the discussion, this article offers a Christian theological analysis of neurorights proposals, asking whether supporting them would be the most appropriate and effective way for Christian believers and communities to respond to the threats posed by some neurotech applications. The answer to this question will require prudential judgment, taking account of legal scholars’ evaluations of these proposals as well as the wisdom and experience of practitioners and activists.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Messer, 2025. "Neurorights and the Common Good: Christian Ethical Perspectives on Neurotechnologies, AI, and Human Rights," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 86-99, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:23:y:2025:i:3:p:86-99
    DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2025.2531645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15570274.2025.2531645
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15570274.2025.2531645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:23:y:2025:i:3:p:86-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rfia20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.