IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rfiaxx/v23y2025i3p34-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

If Not a Religion, Then What? Potential State Responses to the Conundrum of Artificial Intelligence as Religion

Author

Listed:
  • Dorjana Bojanovska Popovska

Abstract

In 2017, Anthony Levandowski’s Way of the Future (WOTF) became the first AI-based church registered under U.S. law. Although officially dissolved in 2021, WOTF has recently regained attention due to rapid advances in generative AI and accessibility of LLMs. Its legacy and potential revival raise critical questions regarding the legal definition of religion and protections under FoRB. Amid rising panic surrounding AI in general and vis-à-vis religion in particular the paper argues that AI-based religions are likely to face challenges to recognition and/or registration, through already established avenues. More particularly, the paper examines three illustrative examples and their potential implications on AI-based religions: classification as parody or satire, as in the case of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster; classification as a fraudulent or sham religion, exampled by the Church of Scientology; and facing restrictions on public order grounds, drawing on cult-related and extremism legislation primarily used against NRMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorjana Bojanovska Popovska, 2025. "If Not a Religion, Then What? Potential State Responses to the Conundrum of Artificial Intelligence as Religion," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 34-47, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:23:y:2025:i:3:p:34-47
    DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2025.2531649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15570274.2025.2531649
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15570274.2025.2531649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:23:y:2025:i:3:p:34-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rfia20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.