IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rfiaxx/v19y2021i2p40-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Covenantal Pluralism in Bangladeshi Public Opinion

Author

Listed:
  • C. Christine Fair
  • Parina Patel

Abstract

In this paper, we explore Bangladeshi popular support for “covenantal pluralism,” a philosophy developed by the Covenantal Pluralism Initiative at the Templeton Religion Trust. We use a novel dataset derived from a 2017 nationally representative survey of Bangladeshi respondents which included numerous survey items germane to this study. Unfortunately, while Bangladesh may most certainly benefit from such a concept, we find little empirical evidence of popular support for its key conditions and propositions. We also find little evidence that any Bangladeshi government would pursue such a concept legally because it would undermine key sources of legitimacy which are necessary to secure the current government’s access to power and opportunities for graft.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Christine Fair & Parina Patel, 2021. "Barriers to Covenantal Pluralism in Bangladeshi Public Opinion," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 40-55, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:40-55
    DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2021.1917117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15570274.2021.1917117
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15570274.2021.1917117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:40-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rfia20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.