IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rfiaxx/v19y2021i2p29-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Bahá’í Faith and Covenantal Pluralism: Promoting Oneness, Respecting Difference

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Palmer
  • Temily Tavangar

Abstract

The core teachings of the Bahá’í Faith are often summarized as the “Oneness of God, the Oneness of Religion, and the Oneness of Humanity.” Can such principles resonate with a pluralism based on the recognition of difference? Covenantal pluralism outlines a set of principles of co-existence based on deep respect for difference that acknowledges the exclusive truth claims of different actors. In this article, we examine how the teachings and practices of the Bahá’í Faith relate to this framework of covenantal pluralism. The “covenantal” vision of human solidarity resonates strongly with the Bahá’í Faith’s own conception of “Covenant” as the foundation of its community, internal constitutional order, and ultimate aims, as well as with the Bahá’í understanding and practice of consultative deliberation. However, the test of pluralism is how Bahá’ís engage with those who reject their religion’s truth claims and aspirations to oneness. In this regard, the Bahá’í teachings affirm the legitimacy of other religions, as well as the choice not to be religious. Bahá’í social engagement emphasizes collaboration with people of different religious and ideological backgrounds in community building, social action, and public discourse. A foundational principle of such engagement is the freedom not to accept the Bahá’í Faith or its teachings. Overall, the Bahá’í approach to pluralism is rooted in an affirmation of ontological oneness that is the foundation for honoring, respecting, and engaging with the social reality of diversity.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Palmer & Temily Tavangar, 2021. "The Bahá’í Faith and Covenantal Pluralism: Promoting Oneness, Respecting Difference," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 29-39, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:29-39
    DOI: 10.1080/15570274.2021.1917138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15570274.2021.1917138
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15570274.2021.1917138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rfiaxx:v:19:y:2021:i:2:p:29-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rfia20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.