IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v37y2025i4p1681-1715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Long Waves 50 Years? Reexamining Economic and Financial Long Wave Periodicities in Kondratieff and Schumpeter

Author

Listed:
  • Jason Hecht

Abstract

In 1925, the Russian economist, Nikolai D. Kondratieff first presented his identification and analysis of a ‘long wave’ cycle of approximately 50 years in twenty-five economic and financial time series across the major capitalist economies. The statistical evidence for their existence was based on nine-year centered moving averages of residuals from econometric time-trend models for eight English and five French time series that spanned the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries. Schumpeter supported and promoted Kondratieff's estimate of a long wave periodicity which was consistent with his trigonometric models published in Business Cycles (1939). While Schumpeter never attempted to measure the statistical association between his theoretical values and historical observations, he identified long waves in the numerous graphs and charts in Business Cycles. Kondratieff's original data is used to estimate long wave periodicities by replicating his published models and smoothed residuals to verify specific years of turning points. ‘Unobserved component models’ are also used to extract long wave periodicities from Kondratieff’s data as well as from new long-term time series recently published by the Bank of England. The new estimates confirm an endogenously-propagated long cycle of about fifty ears.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason Hecht, 2025. "Are Long Waves 50 Years? Reexamining Economic and Financial Long Wave Periodicities in Kondratieff and Schumpeter," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 1681-1715, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:1681-1715
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2023.2280803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2023.2280803
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2023.2280803?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:1681-1715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.