IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v37y2025i3p1164-1185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Intellectual Traditions of Claudia Goldin’s Nobel Winning Work on Gender and its Context in Feminist Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah F. Small
  • Milena Dehn
  • Laura Beltran-Figueroa

Abstract

The 2023 Nobel Prize was awarded to Claudia Goldin for her work on women’s labor market outcomes. In this paper, we consider the intellectual history of Claudia Goldin’s work in this realm. Namely, after providing background for her intellectual lineage and motivations, we offer descriptions of her two main contributions in this realm as identified by the Nobel committee: the U-shaped curve of development and women’s labor force participation and gender wage gaps. After summarizing these works, we illustrate how they were informed by (and deviate from) her Chicago training, and how they relate to (and deviate from) feminist economics. We conclude by contextualizing Goldin’s broader body of work in feminist economic thought. Among other things, we assert that while Goldin’s choice theoretic frameworks are very much based in her Chicago School roots, her focus on unearthing archival data necessary to include women in cliometric research is more in line with feminist approaches to economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah F. Small & Milena Dehn & Laura Beltran-Figueroa, 2025. "Understanding the Intellectual Traditions of Claudia Goldin’s Nobel Winning Work on Gender and its Context in Feminist Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 1164-1185, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:1164-1185
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2025.2483313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2025.2483313
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2025.2483313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:37:y:2025:i:3:p:1164-1185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.