IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v36y2024i2p461-480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

No Rest for the Weary: Measuring the Changing Distribution of Retirement Wealth in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Ghilarducci
  • Siavash Radpour
  • Jessica Forden

Abstract

Since 1992 wealth for the bottom 90 percent of households nearing retirement has fallen. The only source of wealth helping the bottom 90 percent is Social Security. Despite pro savings policies and generous tax breaks for savings, the share of the bottom 50 percent having any retirement account didn’t change in 20 years — 46 percent in 1992 and 47 percent in 2016. Even the middle class suffered; the share of the next 40 percent with retirement savings fell from 85 percent in 1992 to a low of 71 percent in 2016. Housing ownership increased a bit for the bottom 50 percent but fell among the middle class and upper middle class. Home equity for the working and middle class fell. Using SCF and HRS data over 20 years, we find the bulk of working-class wealth is government social insurance. Economists should not exclude social insurance from wealth calculations. We find social insurance is the most important source of wealth for most families. Government policies and institutions have failed wealth building for most American households with workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Ghilarducci & Siavash Radpour & Jessica Forden, 2024. "No Rest for the Weary: Measuring the Changing Distribution of Retirement Wealth in the United States," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 461-480, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:461-480
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2024.2318956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2024.2318956
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2024.2318956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:36:y:2024:i:2:p:461-480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.