IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v32y2020i2p149-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurs and Uncertainty: Max Weber and the Sociology of Economic Action

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen D. Parsons

Abstract

In Economy and Society, Max Weber develops a sociological analysis of economic action, drawing upon ideas developed in the Austrian School of Economics. Despite this Austrian influence, Weber is quite clear his sociological analysis does not constitute an exercise in economic theory. Weber’s account of entrepreneurial action makes it possible to appreciate the distinctness of his sociological analysis of economic action. Weber argues that entrepreneurs make production decisions under conditions of uncertainty, where the goals of action are subject to choice and where consumer wants can be formed through entrepreneurial action. In developing his account of entrepreneurial decision-making, Weber offers an account of economic action that is distinct from the account of economic action dominant in mainstream economics and Austrian economic theory. For Weber, entrepreneurial goals are imagined, and reason does not determine actions but assesses likely consequences of different possibilities for action. A monetary economy allows this assessment to proceed in a more rational manner. This argument is significant for his criticisms of centrally planned economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen D. Parsons, 2020. "Entrepreneurs and Uncertainty: Max Weber and the Sociology of Economic Action," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 149-162, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:32:y:2020:i:2:p:149-162
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2019.1689634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2019.1689634
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2019.1689634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:32:y:2020:i:2:p:149-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.