IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v31y2019i2p247-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-Examining the Development of Hirschman’s Linkage Analysis with Detection of Smithian Flavor

Author

Listed:
  • P. Sai-wing Ho

Abstract

Hirschman’s production linkage (PL) framework has enjoyed a revival of interest since the 1980s, but its complexity and richness have been continually underappreciated. This paper clarifies these, especially the role played by joint PLs, and includes some Smithian flavor, in that the activation of PLs is analogous to extending the division of labor in an economy, and can raise productivity and augment wealth accumulation à la Smith. Consumption linkages (CLs) add demand-side considerations and could reinforce the cumulative nature of joint PL by endogenizing market-size expansion. Barriers posed by ‘technological strangeness’ could prevent PL activation and warrant the use of industrial/technology policies. Hirschman also recommended sensible import substitution, interweaved with export promotion. These policies are examples of fiscal linkages that accord a role for the state to support PL and CL activation. Brief comparisons and contrasts are made with the global value chain research framework. Applying Hirschman’s framework to conduct case studies entails interdisciplinary research into details of socioeconomic settings associated with the success or failure of development. The concepts of complementarities and external economies are central, although there are additional dimensions to be studied and interfaces between them to be explored.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Sai-wing Ho, 2019. "Re-Examining the Development of Hirschman’s Linkage Analysis with Detection of Smithian Flavor," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 247-270, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:31:y:2019:i:2:p:247-270
    DOI: 10.1080/09538259.2019.1635366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09538259.2019.1635366
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538259.2019.1635366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:31:y:2019:i:2:p:247-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.