IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/revpoe/v21y2009i1p85-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sraffa's Interpretation of Marx's Treatment of Fixed Capital

Author

Listed:
  • Fred Moseley

Abstract

It is well known that Sraffa analyzed fixed capital as a 'joint product' along with regular products, such that in each period a given machine (together with other material and labor inputs) produces a regular product plus a one-period-older machine of the same type. What is perhaps less well known is that Sraffa attributed this same method of dealing with fixed capital to Marx, and to Torrens, Malthus, and Ricardo. This paper examines the textual evidence presented by Sraffa to support his interpretation of Marx's treatment of fixed capital, and also examines more comprehensive textual evidence from the three volumes of Capital not considered by Sraffa. It is argued that Marx did not treat fixed capital as a joint product in his theory of prices, but instead consistently assumed a 'straight-line' method of depreciation, according to which a constant fraction of the total value of the fixed capital is transferred to the price of the product in each period, and the remaining value of the fixed capital is not part of the value of the product, but instead 'remains fixed' in the capital goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Fred Moseley, 2009. "Sraffa's Interpretation of Marx's Treatment of Fixed Capital," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 85-100.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:85-100
    DOI: 10.1080/09538250802517006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09538250802517006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09538250802517006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:revpoe:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:85-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.