IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v36y2023i2p2182809.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is economic policy uncertainty an excuse for corporate fraud?

Author

Listed:
  • Zhong Ning
  • Xinzhou Qi

Abstract

This study examines the dynamic relationship between economic policy uncertainty (EPU) and corporate fraud by using a sub-sample time-varying rolling window test. Corporate fraud is classified as fraud incidents (the number of corporate frauds) and fraud magnitude (the severity of corporate frauds). Based on this, we propose an EPU-Fraud Triangle model to evidence that EPU affects corporate fraud by acting on Pressure, Opportunity, and Rationalization. The empirical results show that corporations are more likely to engage in fraud during high EPU periods. Moreover, corporate fraud has positive impacts on EPU. As a result, this study suggests corporations consider fraud consequences and policy trends when making decisions. Additionally, government policymakers should analyze the causes of corporate fraud to develop appropriate policies. In addition, to minimize information asymmetries, investors should pay attention to corporate fraud and remain knowledgeable of national policy trends. Furthermore, the study can contribute to the smooth functioning of macroeconomics and reduce the probability of financial risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhong Ning & Xinzhou Qi, 2023. "Is economic policy uncertainty an excuse for corporate fraud?," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 2182809-218, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:36:y:2023:i:2:p:2182809
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2023.2182809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2182809
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2023.2182809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:36:y:2023:i:2:p:2182809. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.