IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/reroxx/v35y2022i1p2596-2614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative measurement and analysis of FinTech risk in China

Author

Listed:
  • Cangshu Li

Abstract

This study took online lending as the main research object to quantitatively measure FinTech risk in China. A theoretical model was built to analyse the relationship between the assets and liabilities of peer-to-peer platforms and the risk of the entire online lending industry. The conditional value at risk method was used to measure the risk spillover effect of the online lending industry and the different types of platforms. Index smoothing and moving average were used to examine risk contagion. When the risk rate of the portfolio of the platform generally increases, the systemic risk of the whole industry also increases, and if the systemic risk of the industry spreads to the portfolio of the platform, it could affect the stability of the capital flow of the platform, and then affect the risk expectation of the platform itself. Most platforms with risk concerns were private. Banking platforms and public platforms were greatly affected by market risk; however, their own risks had relatively little impact on the overall market. The greater the market risk, the more platforms become risk platforms, and the smaller the impact on transition platforms. Regulatory sandboxes may be an effective means of preventing and controlling Fintech risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Cangshu Li, 2022. "Quantitative measurement and analysis of FinTech risk in China," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 2596-2614, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:35:y:2022:i:1:p:2596-2614
    DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2021.1970606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1970606
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1970606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:reroxx:v:35:y:2022:i:1:p:2596-2614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rero .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.