IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repsxx/v9y2021i2p217-229.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The path, value and limits of the Confucius Institute in carrying out public diplomacy

Author

Listed:
  • Yanwei Wang
  • Chinenye Gerlof Uzodinma
  • Caoyuan Niu

Abstract

On the basis of Chinese language teaching and cultural communication activities, the Confucius Institute carries out a variety of cultural exchange activities between China and the host country, which has become an effective way for China to carry out public diplomacy and participate in global cultural governance. By analysing the concepts of public diplomacy, cultural diplomacy, people-to-people exchange and cultural governance, this paper summarises three typical paths of Confucius Institutes in carrying out public diplomacy: ‘from the government to foreign nationals’, ‘from the government to Chinese citizens and then to foreign nationals’, and ‘from the government to foreign nationals and then to foreign nationals’. The value of the Confucius Institute in carrying out public diplomacy is reflected on the level of national diplomacy, international exchange and global governance. Furthermore, the capability of the Confucius Institute as a language and cultural communication institution initiated by China and in cooperation with other countries in carrying out public diplomacy is limited. This limitation, on one hand, originates from the nature of the Confucius Institute as a language and cultural communication organisation, and on the other hand, is related to the difficulties and challenges that China faces in its participation in global governance. Public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy are based on national interests. They also transcend national interests and, furthermore, become a way for a country to actively participate in global cultural governance. The experience of and challenges faced by the Confucius Institute can have important implications for China in participating in global cultural governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanwei Wang & Chinenye Gerlof Uzodinma & Caoyuan Niu, 2021. "The path, value and limits of the Confucius Institute in carrying out public diplomacy," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 217-229, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:217-229
    DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2021.1914416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20954816.2021.1914416
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20954816.2021.1914416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tamas Szucs, 2023. "Beyond the Battle of Narratives: Global soft power dynamics and the EU’s strategic approach on international cultural relations in the context of the emerging new world order," RSCAS Working Papers 2023/46, European University Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:217-229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.