IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repsxx/v4y2016i3p211-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental participation in the shadow of the Chinese state

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Wilson

Abstract

China’s environmental governance reforms are simultaneously strengthening state enforcement measures and encouraging citizen participation in monitoring and enforcement processes. State control over environmental protection and citizen participation appear to be in tension with each other. In discussing environmental governance under democracies, Börzel and Riesse, however, theorise that opportunities for citizen participation increase as a state increases its enforcement capacity, at least until the state becomes very strong. This article analyses changes in the regulatory field that have strengthened state coercive capacity to enforce environmental law, and two aspects of citizen participation: civil society monitoring of polluters and participation in environmental public interest lawsuits. The early evidence on citizen participation since the revised Environmental Protection Law took effect on 1 January 2015 is mixed. Civil society organisations have been allowed to serve as plaintiffs in a small number of high-profile environmental public interest lawsuits, but that domain remains dominated by state-backed organisations and local procuratorates. Finally, in reaction to the threat of new fines and penalties on illegal emissions, some grassroots civil society organisations are finding new opportunities to advise and monitor polluters.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Wilson, 2016. "Environmental participation in the shadow of the Chinese state," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 211-237, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:4:y:2016:i:3:p:211-237
    DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2016.1218662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20954816.2016.1218662
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20954816.2016.1218662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:4:y:2016:i:3:p:211-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.