IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repsxx/v13y2025i3p326-346.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of research funding on academic outputs: Evidence from the personnel data in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Song
  • Wenkai Sun
  • Yufei Zhang

Abstract

This paper is one of the first attempts that analyse the ­effectiveness of national research funding based on personnel data in ­developing countries. We employ the personnel data from 1998 to 2015 in the field of economics and management of a prestigious Chinese ­university to study the effect of receiving national research funding on the quantity and quality of subsequent academic research. We find that receiving funding can indeed improve the quantity and quality of publications. However, although an increase in the amount of funding can improve the quantity of publications, it does not have a statistically significant effect on the research quality. These results are mostly consistent with the goal-setting ­mechanism, as the amount of funding is usually positively ­correlated with the expected number of research outputs specified in the application file as a binding contract. We also find that national funding can help researchers find more suitable co-authors and publish more co-authored works, even after the funding period ends, thus generating a long-term collaboration effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Song & Wenkai Sun & Yufei Zhang, 2025. "The impact of research funding on academic outputs: Evidence from the personnel data in China," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 326-346, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:326-346
    DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2024.2439619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20954816.2024.2439619
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20954816.2024.2439619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:326-346. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.