IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repsxx/v13y2025i2p125-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What determines global sentiment towards China’s Belt and Road Initiative?

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia García-Herrero

Abstract

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is one of the most important geopolitical phenomena of this century. It signals China’s increasing clout overseas while focussing on trade links and infrastructure in general. An important question which has not yet been fully answered is how different countries perceive this initiative, whether they are part of it or not. To answer this question, a large media repository, GDELT, is used to assess each country’s perceptions of the BRI and how they evolve over time. The main finding is that global sentiment on the BRI deteriorated significantly in most geographies from 2017 to 2022, although generally still in positive territory. Further, an empirical analysis is conducted to test the relationship between individual countries’ sentiment towards the BRI and three possible determinants, i.e. economic linkages with China, geopolitical closeness with China, and a country’s perceptions and attitudes about some China-related issues. The results suggest that import dependence on China seems to worsen the image of the BRI. Instead, a country’s geopolitical alignment with China, whether by being a member of the BRI or by voting at the United Nations (UN) like China, is positively correlated with its perceptions of the BRI.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia García-Herrero, 2025. "What determines global sentiment towards China’s Belt and Road Initiative?," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 125-143, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:125-143
    DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2024.2379671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20954816.2024.2379671
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20954816.2024.2379671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:13:y:2025:i:2:p:125-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.