IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repsxx/v12y2024i2p143-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural tightness, trust, and power in enforcing tax compliance

Author

Listed:
  • Aloys Prinz

Abstract

The so-called Cultural Tightness–Looseness (CTL) concept intends to describe the socio-cultural foundation of societies by the strictness of social norms. In this paper, CTL is used to investigate its relevance to enforcing tax compliance. The CTL concept is formalised by structural payoff matrices for the confrontation between citizens and officials. Social norms and their impacts on the behaviour of the parties in a conflict are used to define several variants of tight and loose societies. The payoff matrices are employed to classify respective forms of societies. For a dynamic analysis, ‘power’ and ‘trust’, as policy measures of behaviour control, are introduced to determine which instrument or combination of instruments emerges as the most relevant and effective option in the respective societal setting. The result is that ‘trust’ emerges in tight societies as the more important instrument of behaviour control, whereas ‘power’ appears as the more crucial tool in loose societies. Therefore, it is concluded that power or the ‘cops and robbers’ approach is usually applied in loose societies to enforce tax compliance. By contrast, ‘trust’ via the provision of information and support for paying taxes can be more often used in tight societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Aloys Prinz, 2024. "Cultural tightness, trust, and power in enforcing tax compliance," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 143-170, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:143-170
    DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2023.2203306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20954816.2023.2203306
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20954816.2023.2203306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:143-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.