IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/repsxx/v10y2022i2p155-180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

News coverage of Confucius Institutes in the pre-Trump era

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Akhtaruzzaman
  • Nathan Berg
  • Donald Lien
  • Ying Wu

Abstract

A novel dataset is presented that reveals a general pattern of declining favourability in news stories about Confucius Institutes (CIs) from 2006 through 2015 in six English-speaking countries: the US, the UK, Canada, Australia, India and Kenya. There are significant differences in mean favourability and time trends across countries, however. Decreasing trends in favourability are observed in the US and Canada, in particular, whereas Kenya and India’s time trends are nil or possibly increasing. We report empirical models of favourability conditional on GDP per capita, trade with China and the number of CIs across country-year observations. Consistent with Pew polling data, our data reveal an interesting pair of conflicting income effects. High-income countries tend to be more negative and less positive on CIs than low-income countries overall. Within-country positive shocks to real GDP per capita, however, are positively associated with favourability after cross-country differences in income levels are absorbed by country fixed effects. The number of CIs in a country has mixed effects on the favourability of news coverage about CIs across country-year observations. Despite billions of dollars spent on public diplomacy by the Chinese government, our findings suggest that its return on investment in public diplomacy in the form of CIs may not be as expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Akhtaruzzaman & Nathan Berg & Donald Lien & Ying Wu, 2022. "News coverage of Confucius Institutes in the pre-Trump era," Economic and Political Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 155-180, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:155-180
    DOI: 10.1080/20954816.2020.1870025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20954816.2020.1870025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20954816.2020.1870025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:repsxx:v:10:y:2022:i:2:p:155-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/reps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.