IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rehdxx/v41y2026i2p93-124.html

Racial disparities in human capital: Numeracy in South Africa, 1850–1980

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco J. Marco-Gracia
  • María Carmen Pérez-Artés
  • Amy Rommelspacher

Abstract

South Africa prior to 1994 constitutes a paradigmatic case of entrenched racial segregation and state-sanctioned discrimination. Black, Coloured, and Asian populations were systematically relegated to a subordinate status compared to the dominant White minority. Drawing on direct statistical sources, such as censuses and national budgets, this study explores long-term disparities through the lens of numeracy, a proxy for basic arithmetic skills. We analyse numeracy levels by race across cohorts born between the 1850s and the 1980s, with a particular focus on the Black population, given its demographic predominance. A key contribution is to document heterogeneity by province of residence, alongside gender and birth cohort. Our results show clear and persistent gaps in numeracy by race and gender, with Black individuals and women consistently disadvantaged. Notably, numeracy levels indicative of full numeracy were not attained by the Black population until the 1960s cohort, more than a century after White individuals had reached that threshold. Strikingly, we also find comparatively high numeracy levels in the homelands; while data-quality concerns remain, this pattern is consistent with scholarship on African agency and locally sustained educational initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco J. Marco-Gracia & María Carmen Pérez-Artés & Amy Rommelspacher, 2026. "Racial disparities in human capital: Numeracy in South Africa, 1850–1980," Economic History of Developing Regions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 93-124, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rehdxx:v:41:y:2026:i:2:p:93-124
    DOI: 10.1080/20780389.2026.2653523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20780389.2026.2653523
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20780389.2026.2653523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rehdxx:v:41:y:2026:i:2:p:93-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rehd20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.