IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

European Union evaluation between myth and reality: Reflections on the Italian experience

Listed author(s):
  • Fabrizio Barca
Registered author(s):

    Barca F. (2006) European Union evaluation between myth and reality: reflections on the Italian experience, Regional Studies 40, 273-276. The paper examines the role of European Union Cohesion policy evaluation in a new strategic approach to the design and implementation of the Structural Funds in Italy, launched in 1998. Models were used to establish benchmarks for policy, evaluation guidelines were produced, and investment in evaluation capacity was undertaken at national and regional levels. These initiatives have improved the knowledge base for decision-making and contributed to a more rigorous and open debate on policy choices in both the current Structural Funds period and for the National Strategic Reference Framework for 2007-13. Strategic approach Evaluation guidelines Benchmarks Italy Barca F. (2006) L'evaluation dans l'UE - entre le mythe et la realite: des reflexions sur l'experience italienne, Regional Studies 40, 273-276. Cet article cherche a examiner le role de la politique de cohesion de l'UE dans une nouvelle approche strategique d'aborder la conception et la mise en oeuvre des Fonds structurels en Italie, lancee en 1998. Des modeles ont ete employes afin de construire des 'benchmarks' pour la politique, des lignes directices d'evaluation ont ete produites, et l'investissement dans la capacite d'evaluation a ete entrepris aux niveaux national et regional. Ces intiatives ont fini par ameliorer la base de connaissance quant a la prise de decision et ont contribue a un debat plus rigoureux et plus ouvert a propos du choix de politique pour la periode actuelle des Fonds structurels et pour le cadre de reference strategique national 2007-13. Approche strategique Lignes directices d'evaluation Benchmarks Italie Barca F. (2006) EU-Evaluierung zwischen Mythos und Wirklichkeit: Beobachtungen uber Italiens Erfahrungen, Regional Studies 40, 273-276. Dieser Aufsatz untersucht die Rolle der Evaluierung der europaischen Kohasionspolitik in einem neuen strategischen Ansatz zu Entwurf und Implementierung der Strukturfonds in Italien, der 1998 eingefuhrt wurde. Es wurden Policy-Benchmarking-Modelle benutzt, es wurden Evaluierungsrichtlinien erstellt, und man hat in Evaluierungskapazitat auf uberregionaler und regionaler Ebene investiert. Diese Initiativen haben die Wissensgrundlage fur Beschlussfassungen verbessert, und zu einer grundlicheren und aufgeschlosseneren Debatte der zu beschreitenden politischen Wege der laufenden Strukturfondsperiode wie auch des Einzelstaatlichen Strategischen Rahmenplans fur den Zeitraum 2007-2013 gefuhrt. strategischer Ansatz Evaluierungsrichtlinien Benchmarks Italien Barca F. (2006) La evaluacion de la UE, ¿mito o realidad? Observaciones sobre el caso italiano, Regional Studies 40, 273-276. En este articulo se analiza que papel tiene la evaluacion de la politica de cohesion de la UE en el nuevo planteamiento estrategico, introducido en 1998, para crear y poner en marcha los Fondos Estructurales de Italia. Se utilizaron modelos para determinar analisis comparativos para la politica, se crearon pautas de evaluacion y se llevo a cabo una inversion en la capacidad de evaluacion a nivel nacional y regional. Estas iniciativas han mejorado la base de conocimiento a la hora de tomar decisiones y han contribuido a un debate mas riguroso y abierto sobre las opciones a elegir en la politica tanto para el periodo actual de los Fondos Estructurales como para El Marco Estrategico de Referencia Nacional para 2007-13. Planteamiento estrategico Pautas de evaluacion Analisis comparativos Italia

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Regional Studies.

    Volume (Year): 40 (2006)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 273-276

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:273-276
    DOI: 10.1080/00343400600600710
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:40:y:2006:i:2:p:273-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.