IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recsxx/v26y2023i1p2207326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How much should we trust R2 and adjusted R2: evidence from regressions in top economics journals and Monte Carlo simulations

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Chen
  • Ji Qi

Abstract

R2 and adjusted R2 may exaggerate a model’s true ability to predict the dependent variable in the presence of overfitting, whereas leave-one-out R2 (LOOR2) is robust to overfitting. We demonstrate this by replicating 279 regressions from 100 papers in top economics journals, where the median increases of R2 and adjusted R2 over LOOR2 reach 40.2% and 21.4% respectively. The inflation of test errors over training errors increases with the severity of overfitting as measured by the number of regressors and nonlinear terms, and the presence of outliers, but decreases with the sample size. These results are further validated by Monte Carlo simulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Chen & Ji Qi, 2023. "How much should we trust R2 and adjusted R2: evidence from regressions in top economics journals and Monte Carlo simulations," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 2207326-220, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:26:y:2023:i:1:p:2207326
    DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2023.2207326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15140326.2023.2207326
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15140326.2023.2207326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:26:y:2023:i:1:p:2207326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.