IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recsxx/v24y2021i1p114-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The key to system performance lies in implementation: empirical evidence from labor dispute data of Shanghai from 1918 to 1940

Author

Listed:
  • Junjie Hong
  • Zhihua Guan

Abstract

The process of system implementation could be the key to determining system performance. This paper discusses this issue by using empirical methods to analyze Shanghai labor dispute cases. Although the labor dispute settlement system is designed to protect workers, empirical analyses show that government intervention will inhibit workers in labor disputes. Further analysis reveals that government intervention is selective based on the case reasons and differs in intensity. In addition, the events that affect government power may influence the case outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Junjie Hong & Zhihua Guan, 2021. "The key to system performance lies in implementation: empirical evidence from labor dispute data of Shanghai from 1918 to 1940," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 114-140, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:114-140
    DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2021.1896320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15140326.2021.1896320
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15140326.2021.1896320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recsxx:v:24:y:2021:i:1:p:114-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.