IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recjxx/v22y2026i2p435-455.html

The Commission’s Art.102 TFEU guidelines: consolidation or creation?

Author

Listed:
  • Dirk Auer
  • Lazar Radic

Abstract

In August 2024, the European Commission released revised Draft Guidelines on the application of Article 102 TFEU to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant firms. This paper assesses the Guidelines through the lenses of legality and clarity—core to ensuring predictable enforcement and consistent litigation outcomes. We argue that the Guidelines use convoluted language to support a tenuous reading of the case law, risking ambiguous interpretations of Article 102 and influencing market behaviour in ways that may contradict the law’s intent. Although they claim to codify the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice, the Guidelines depart from it by selectively reading in presumptions of illegality while downplaying effects analysis. In doing so, they reflect the Commission’s preferred policy stance rather than settled law. These shifts push the Guidelines beyond the proper bounds of soft law, creating legal uncertainty and increasing the likelihood of conflict with the Court.

Suggested Citation

  • Dirk Auer & Lazar Radic, 2026. "The Commission’s Art.102 TFEU guidelines: consolidation or creation?," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 435-455, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:22:y:2026:i:2:p:435-455
    DOI: 10.1080/17441056.2025.2511419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17441056.2025.2511419
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17441056.2025.2511419?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:22:y:2026:i:2:p:435-455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.