IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recjxx/v21y2025i3p554-583.html

(Re-)Reviewing mergers under Article 102 TFEU? An overview of ex post merger policy in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Max van Iersel

Abstract

The Court affirmed the continued applicability of Article 102 TFEU to mergers in Towercast. This paper explores the relationship between the Merger Regulation and Article 102 TFEU from a historical and hierarchy of norms perspectives. It evaluates the implications of Towercast for the role of Article 102 TFEU within the EU merger control framework. From a hierarchical norms perspective, the continued applicability of Article 102 TFEU to non-notifiable mergers is a logical outcome. This perspective supports the possibility of re-reviewing cleared mergers under Article 102 TFEU. Re-reviews are likely a rare occurrence, with most ex post interventions targeting non-notifiable mergers. Ex post merger policy may serve as a valuable corrective mechanism to the Merger Regulation, allowing the correction of missteps in clearance decisions and ensuring that mergers that initially escaped scrutiny are addressed. The effectiveness of the system is constrained by procedural limitations due to the exclusion of Regulation 1/2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Max van Iersel, 2025. "(Re-)Reviewing mergers under Article 102 TFEU? An overview of ex post merger policy in the EU," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 554-583, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:21:y:2025:i:3:p:554-583
    DOI: 10.1080/17441056.2025.2464495
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17441056.2025.2464495
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17441056.2025.2464495?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:21:y:2025:i:3:p:554-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.