IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recjxx/v21y2025i3p531-553.html

Making your case under Art. 101, 102 TFEU: the evidence standards in competition law appeals and cartel damage proceedings

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Weck

Abstract

The literature on Art. 101 and Art. 102 TFEU typically covers the legal requirements for finding violations and the economics underlying the legal theories of harm. The focus of that literature is on whether the enforcement agencies or civil claimants “got it right” in substance. What is less often discussed, at least beyond individual cases, is how the courts deal with issues of factual uncertainty. This is the realm of procedural law, more specifically the court rules and related jurisprudence on the taking and assessment of evidence. The present article argues that the European Court of Justice’s case law on evidence-related matters constitutes a largely harmonized body of law, although procedural competences remain dispersed among the EU and the Member States. This finding is of practical relevance as it allows to develop general principles for evidence-based strategies in court.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Weck, 2025. "Making your case under Art. 101, 102 TFEU: the evidence standards in competition law appeals and cartel damage proceedings," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 531-553, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:21:y:2025:i:3:p:531-553
    DOI: 10.1080/17441056.2024.2440230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17441056.2024.2440230
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17441056.2024.2440230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:21:y:2025:i:3:p:531-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.