IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recjxx/v21y2025i1p25-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality control in the DMA procedure: the exclusion of the Hearing Officer

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinos Pantelidis

Abstract

The DMA aims to ensure fairness and contestability in digital markets by imposing ex-ante obligations to designated gatekeepers. Enforcement of the regime was entrusted to the Commission and the procedure mirrors the antitrust regime. However, the designers of the Regulation opted to exclude a role for the Hearing Officer from market investigation proceedings. The Hearing Officer is an independent Commission Official whose main role is to safeguard the undertakings' procedural rights and rights of defence, decide on procedural disputes, and organize oral hearings. Despite some criticisms to the limited extent of their powers, the Hearing Officer fulfils an important role in competition proceedings. Exclusion of their competence from the DMA procedure may result in an increase to the Commission's decisional powers, reduce public trust, lower the quality of the procedure, and deprive it of the valuable oral hearing option.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinos Pantelidis, 2025. "Quality control in the DMA procedure: the exclusion of the Hearing Officer," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 25-53, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:21:y:2025:i:1:p:25-53
    DOI: 10.1080/17441056.2024.2379136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17441056.2024.2379136
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17441056.2024.2379136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:21:y:2025:i:1:p:25-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.