IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recjxx/v17y2021i3p593-616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pharmaceuticals and market definition: a cautionary tale

Author

Listed:
  • Rhonda L. Smith
  • Arlen Duke

Abstract

There is no simple prescription for defining the relevant product market for pharmaceuticals. As price is usually the key variable, the price inelastic demand for pharmaceuticals complicates the market definition process. It unsurprising then that when, as in relation to pharmaceuticals, demand is relatively price inelastic the process of defining the product dimension of a market is more complex. In relation to pharmaceuticals, the question is therefore whether a change in some other variable would cause substitution and so constrain decision-making and, if so, how to best identify such constraints. By reference to approaches adopted in several key cases, this article considers alternative approaches that can be used to identify the product dimension of pharmaceutical markets, including the use of natural events/experiments, the use of consumption data as well as qualitative indicators. The article concludes with a suggested alternative approach based on functionality, response to product quality variation and context.

Suggested Citation

  • Rhonda L. Smith & Arlen Duke, 2021. "Pharmaceuticals and market definition: a cautionary tale," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 593-616, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:17:y:2021:i:3:p:593-616
    DOI: 10.1080/17441056.2021.1921516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17441056.2021.1921516
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17441056.2021.1921516?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:17:y:2021:i:3:p:593-616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.