IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recjxx/v17y2021i1p118-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-sided market definition: some common misunderstandings

Author

Listed:
  • Gunnar Niels
  • Helen Ralston

Abstract

Market definition remains an important step in competition cases. The European Commission is in the process of updating its 1997 Market Definition Notice. One hotly debated topic is defining markets for two-sided platforms. In this article we address some of the main questions and misunderstandings about two-sided market definition, We discuss how the hypothetical monopolist test and critical loss analysis apply to two-sided platforms, and address questions such as: Should there be one market for the platform, or two markets (one for each side)? Is there a distinction in market definition between transaction and non-transaction platforms? What if the externalities flow in only one direction? What if the price is zero on one side of the platform? And can the market include non-platform competitors?

Suggested Citation

  • Gunnar Niels & Helen Ralston, 2021. "Two-sided market definition: some common misunderstandings," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 118-133, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:118-133
    DOI: 10.1080/17441056.2020.1851478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17441056.2020.1851478
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17441056.2020.1851478?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:17:y:2021:i:1:p:118-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.