IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recjxx/v14y2018i1p152-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making the case for competition in policymaking – lessons from CMA advocacy 2014–2018

Author

Listed:
  • John Kirkpatrick

Abstract

This article draws on the experience of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) of using its powers to provide information and advice to government, including the power to make recommendations on legislation, and derives some lessons for the CMA itself and for other competition authorities seeking to use similar powers. It describes the regime within which the CMA operates, places its current activities in a historical context, and then uses five case examples of public CMA advocacy activity to illustrate various aspects of the use of its powers, in relation to energy, education, transport and public information policy. It highlights the importance of bringing to bear knowledge based on casework, of understanding the political context, of matching the scale and nature of intervention to both the importance of the issue and the prospects of success, of persistence and timing of advice, and of choosing whether to advise publicly or privately on the prospects for influence. It also comments on the CMA’s assessment of the impact of this work.

Suggested Citation

  • John Kirkpatrick, 2018. "Making the case for competition in policymaking – lessons from CMA advocacy 2014–2018," European Competition Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 152-173, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:14:y:2018:i:1:p:152-173
    DOI: 10.1080/17441056.2018.1460974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17441056.2018.1460974
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17441056.2018.1460974?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recjxx:v:14:y:2018:i:1:p:152-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.