IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/recgxx/v97y2021i1p89-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hiding in the Spotlight: Commodifying Nature and Geographies of Dissociation in the Fur-Fashion Complex

Author

Listed:
  • Felix C. Müller
  • Jana M. Kleibert
  • Oliver Ibert

Abstract

Multiple challenges plague actors that commodify nature and create markets around products made from natural organisms. Primary among these is the reputational risk that results from negative impressions and moral contestations such as animal abuse, bad labor conditions, or pollution. In this contribution, we draw on cultural economic geography, and in particular the concept of dissociation, to demonstrate how supply side actors deal with such threats to their reputation. Geographies of dissociation provide a spatial perspective on the social construction of economic value, with a particular focus on the purposeful obfuscation of practices and the disconnection of discourses. We use the fur-fashion complex as a single case study, representing an extreme but instructive example, to study the agencies and effects of dissociative practices empirically. During our in-depth qualitative research on both the production and consumption of fur fashion, we focus on proactive and reactive dissociative strategies of the most powerful commercial actors in the field: fur-breeder associations and retail brands/brand owners.

Suggested Citation

  • Felix C. Müller & Jana M. Kleibert & Oliver Ibert, 2021. "Hiding in the Spotlight: Commodifying Nature and Geographies of Dissociation in the Fur-Fashion Complex," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 97(1), pages 89-112, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:recgxx:v:97:y:2021:i:1:p:89-112
    DOI: 10.1080/00130095.2020.1858713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00130095.2020.1858713
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00130095.2020.1858713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:recgxx:v:97:y:2021:i:1:p:89-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/recg .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.